Apple’s significant impact on the market tends to draw attention from companies that might not have otherwise entered a specific product category—aka “The Apple Effect.” With the entrance of Apple Vision Pro, one such entity to follow suit is Stryker’s Mako, a robotic surgery group initially founded as a standalone company by Rony Abovitz, the founder and first CEO of AR unicorn Magic Leap.

Abovitz founded Mako Surgical in 2004, and left the medical robot company when it was acquired by Stryker for $1.65 billion in 2013, or just around three years after Magic Leap was founded by Abovitz in stealth mode.

Now, Vision Pro users can download the myMako app, which lets surgeons visualize and review surgical plans in an immersive way. It’s not exactly ironic that Mako (by way of Stryker) chose Vision Pro and not Magic Leap, but the link is certainly telling of how the broader market is reacting to Apple’s first headset.

View post on imgur.com

Released in 2018, Magic Leap’s first headset actually had a lot in common with Vision Pro; it was multi-thousand dollar standalone mostly targeted at developers and professionals. At risk of comparing mixed reality Apples too closely to augmented reality oranges, one of the key differentiators was the lack of broad app integration that would make it more usable for prosumers looking for “the next big thing.”

Palmer Lucker donning ML1 | Image courtesy Palmer Luckey

There are a few more reasons ML1 didn’t fare well. It was supposed to change the entire industry, but with a relatively narrow field of view (FOV) and less-than-cutting edge optics, it was famously lambasted by Oculus founder Palmer Luckey at launch as a “flashy hype vehicle that almost nobody can actually use in a meaningful way, and many of their design decisions seem to be driven by that reality.”

Precisely one pivot and one CEO change later, which would see Abovitz eventually leave the company, Magic Leap abandoned any notion of serving prosumers, instead appealing solely to enterprise with the launch of Magic Leap 2 in 2022.

SEE ALSO
Netflix CEO on Vision Pro App Snub: "not particularly relevant to our members"

To boot, myMako is very much the sort of thing that could have launched on any number of XR headsets—Magic Leap (1 or 2), Microsoft HoloLens (1 or 2), or any VR headset for that matter, as it basically presents surgeons with 3D images obtained from computer tomography (CT) based scans. Many such examples of pre-op medical apps already exist, including SurgicalAR from Medivis, which launched on HoloLens 2 prior to coming to Vision Pro last month.

So why Apple, and why now?

Big Apple, Big Stability

For the newcomers like myMako, some of it may come down to the stability Apple represents. As a the second-most valuable company in the world behind Microsoft, Apple not only brings brand cachet, but a whole interlocked ecosystem of apps and services that appeal to a wider audience, ranging from prosumers to professionals—something Microsoft tried to do with Windows Universal Apps on HoloLens, but failed to make it into the sort of general computing device Vision Pro is now.

Notably, a part of Vision Pro’s immediate success can be attributed to its support for over a million iOS apps, and more than a thousand visionOS natives. And that’s in spite of its $3,500 price tag.

Image by Road to VR

And unlike Microsoft, Apple’s primary focus on consumer hardware makes it the ideal “rising tide to lift all boats” when it comes to XR headsets. Now a little over one month since launch, we’re starting to see how the competition is reacting to Vision Pro.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has gone on record to say he thinks Quest 3 is just “better for the vast majority of things that people used mixed reality for.” Fighting words aside, Meta announced late last month it was partnering with LG on what is rumored to be Quest Pro 2, which ought to more directly compete with Vision Pro.

SEE ALSO
Vision Pro Durability Tests Show Glass Has Great Shatter Resistance, But Scratches Easily

Meanwhile, Samsung has partnered with Google to release its own Vision Pro competitor, which will include Android XR at its core—a first salvo from the beleaguered AR/VR team at Google, which previously headed its dashed Daydream platform ambitions and internal AR glasses research, which was also summarily shuttered.

It seems ‘The Apple Effect’ is pushing every major hardware company to rethink its next steps on the road to XR, and how it will remain competitive with the Big Apple in the long term now that Vision Pro is here. Whatever the case, it’s certainly enough to bring XR-adjacent companies like Stryker’s Mako sub-brand into the fold, which we expect will continue as Apple prepares its cheaper, more accessible follow-up to Vision Pro, which is reportedly arriving sooner than expected.

Newsletter graphic

This article may contain affiliate links. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product we may receive a small commission which helps support the publication. More information.


Well before the first modern XR products hit the market, Scott recognized the potential of the technology and set out to understand and document its growth. He has been professionally reporting on the space for nearly a decade as Editor at Road to VR, authoring more than 3,500 articles on the topic. Scott brings that seasoned insight to his reporting from major industry events across the globe.
  • Why is Abovitz not in prison …??

    • xyzs

      I would never buy anything from this scammer indeed.

      It’s like partnering with Adam Neumann, it’s just not ethical.

      • johnyjazz

        Or Elizabeth Holmes!

    • He’s not in prison because:

      1. He didn’t break any federal laws, of any kind.
      2. He did actually deliver a product, which is what he set out to do, anyway.

  • Christian Schildwaechter

    myMako could have launched on any XR headset, but launching it on AVP makes a lot more sense than the available alternatives. For one nobody doing robot assisted surgery will have problems with the USD 3500 price, which will be only a very tiny fraction of what the other equipment will cost. The currently unmatched resolution and the quick to pick up use with hand tracking and objects being displayed in the users actual environment all fit perfectly for the visualization of small 3D objects to non-technical personnel.

    There is no need for a full immersive mode, no need for any type of controller a more complex application might require, so a Quest or HTC Focus 3 don’t offer real benefits. The app is used during the preparation phase, not during the operation, where true see-through HMDs like Magic Leap or Hololens might be better despite the low FoV, because they don’t impair close-up stereo vision essential for any surgeon, something no pass-through HMD without varifocal lenses and very advanced zoom cameras will be able to match. And AVP support is as close as the next Apple store, with Apple offering special services for small businesses and enterprise.

    There may be some Apple effect involved, but for this very specific use case and area of application, the productivity focused Vision Pro s simply the most logical choice from a technical point of view.

  • Dragon Marble

    Implying that the brand is the bigger factor than the specs in this particular case. Declaring Vision Pro an “immediate success”. It appears Apple does have an “effect” on the author.